Difference between revisions of "Blending layers of CUMULATE's user model"

Revision as of 14:09, 28 June 2009

This page is under construction. More content will be added soon

This work is focused on mutual influence of heterogeneous user activity types (reading texts, viewing examples, and solving problems) on user's knowledge of some educational domain. Ordinarily CUMULATE's considers them separately by classifying them to modeling tiers or levels, each corresponding to a level of Bloom's taxonomy of intellectual behavior. Great part of this work is devoted on cross-tier user modeling. Namely, how user activity can (positively) influence on another/other layer(s).

Study 1

In this study we have inspected the influence of the comprehension layer of CUMULATE's user model (viewing examples) on the application layer (solving problems). Our approach was to create "blends" of problem-solving tier of the user model and weighted (from 0 to 1, with .1 step) example viewing tier Our hypotheses were that:

Using example browsing activity when modeling problem solving improves model accuracy
Different users benefit from different “blends” of user model levels

In addition we wanted to se if

There is a single optimal blend for all users, and. or
Classes of users benefitting from different model blends can be determined

Data

We were using previously collected student usage logs collected from 4 Database Management courses offered during Fall 2007 and Spring 2008 semesters at the University of Pittsburgh and Dublin City University. Each course had roughly the same structure, an identical set of 48 problems served by SQLKnoT system, and an identical set of 64 examples served by WebEx system. Basic usage statistics are given in the table below.

School	Semester	Level	No. of users	Avg. problem attempts	Avg. example views	Avg. distinct problems	Avg. distinct examples
U. of Pitt	Fall 2007	U*	27	156.40	189.00	29.96	32.07
U. of Pitt	Fall 2007	G	20	61.70	104.70	29.95	29.10
U. of Pitt	Spring 2008	U	15	26.94	46.65	16.35	10.29
DCU	Spring 2008	U	52	81.68	257.25	22.82	38.63

U – undergraduate, G – graduate

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 | 38.63
 |}
+* U – undergraduate, G – graduate
 === Procedures ===