Difference between revisions of "PAWS"

From PAWS Lab
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
* [[RDF]] - has single vocabulary [[rdf]]
 
* [[RDF]] - has single vocabulary [[rdf]]
 
* [[RDFS]] - has single vocabulary [[rdfs]]
 
* [[RDFS]] - has single vocabulary [[rdfs]]
 +
* [[OWL]]
 
* [[DC|Dublin Core]] - has vocabularies [[dc]], [[dcterms]], [[dcmitypes]]
 
* [[DC|Dublin Core]] - has vocabularies [[dc]], [[dcterms]], [[dcmitypes]]
 
* [[RSS]] - has single vocabulary [[rss]] (here we mean RSS v.1.0)
 
* [[RSS]] - has single vocabulary [[rss]] (here we mean RSS v.1.0)
 
* [[FOAF]] - has single vocabulary [[foaf]]
 
* [[FOAF]] - has single vocabulary [[foaf]]
* [[OWL]]
+
* [[LOM]] - has vocabularies [[lom]], [[lomvoc]], [[lomstruc]], [[lomagglvl]], [[lomstatus]], [[lominttype]], [[lomlrtype]], [[lomintlvl]], [[lomsemden]], [[lominteur]], [[lomcon]], [[lomdiff]], [[lomrole]], [[lombrotech]], [[lomostech]], [[lompurp]]
  
 
== Equivalence ==
 
== Equivalence ==

Revision as of 18:05, 19 October 2007

ADAPT² RDF Bindings.

The main purpose of this wiki is to map entity-relationship models of applications in ADAPT² architecture to RDF.

This wiki has the following structural units:

  • ER Models - describe individual adaptive applications. Each entity and relationship is supplied with a list of suggested RDF bindings
  • RDF schemata - describe classes and properties with suggested use in describing entities and relationships of applications. Each schema can have several vocabularies identified by prefixes

Conventions

  • Objects and Entities are shown in boldface
  • Properties and relationships - regular face
  • Schema is written in upper case, e.g. DC, vocabulary in lower case, e.g. dc, dcterms
  • ER Element is RDF-serialized - (green check-mark)
  • RDF Serialization of ER Element is arguably unnecessary - (red ballot X)
  • Decision on RDF serialization needs clarification - ?¿ (bold blue question mark and inverted question mark)

ER Models

RDF Schemata and Vocabularies

Equivalence

Among various RDF schemata and vocabularies there exist overlap in what they actually mean. For example, dc:title, rdf:label, and rss:title all mean the same. We will maintain (our) classes of equivalence as a reference to RDF homonyms.